Hanafi
The sources give no view for it here.
هل يجوز اشتراط الرهن في عقد السلم؟
Not stated in the sources
Not stated in the sources
Not stated in the sources
Not stated in the sources
١٦١٨ - مَسْأَلَةٌ: وَاشْتِرَاطُ الْكَفِيلِ فِي السَّلَمِ يَفْسُدُ بِهِ السَّلَمُ؛ لِأَنَّهُ شَرْطٌ لَيْسَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى فَهُوَ بَاطِلٌ. وَأَمَّا اشْتِرَاطُ الرَّهْنِ فِيهِ فَجَائِزٌ، لِمَا ذَكَرْنَا فِي " كِتَابِ الرَّهْنِ " فَأَغْنَى عَنْ إعَادَتِهِ وَمِمَّنْ أَبْطَلَ بِهِ الْعَقْدَ ابْنُ عُمَرَ، وَسَعِيدُ بْنُ جُبَيْرٍ، وَغَيْرُهُمَا. [مَسْأَلَة السَّلَم فِي الدَّرَاهِم وَالدَّنَانِير]
The sources give no view for it here.
The sources give no view for it here.
The sources give no view for it here.
The sources give no view for it here.
What is «in our words» is our standard wording; the books’ texts stay as they are.