Hanafi
The sources give no view for it here.
تفاضل اليقين وطروء الشك
هل يتفاضل اليقين، وما أثر دخول الشك أو الجحد فيه؟
Each school’s answer
In our wordsHanafi
Not stated in the sources
Maliki
Not stated in the sources
Shafi'i
Not stated in the sources
Hanbali
Not stated in the sources
The texts
٨٠ - مَسْأَلَةٌ: وَالْيَقِينُ لَا يَتَفَاضَلُ، لَكِنْ إنْ دَخَلَ فِيهِ شَيْءٌ مِنْ شَكٍّ أَوْ جَحْدٍ بَطَلَ كُلُّهُ. بُرْهَانُ ذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْيَقِينَ هُوَ إثْبَاتُ الشَّيْءِ، وَلَا يُمْكِنُ أَنْ يَكُونَ إثْبَاتٌ أَكْثَرَ مِنْ إثْبَاتٍ، فَإِنْ لَمْ يُحَقِّقْ الْإِثْبَاتَ صَارَ شَكًّا. [مَسْأَلَةٌ الْمَعَاصِي كَبَائِرُ فَوَاحِشُ وَسَيِّئَاتٌ صَغَائِرُ وَلَمَمٌ]
From the schools’ own books
Maliki
The sources give no view for it here.
Shafi'i
The sources give no view for it here.
Hanbali
The sources give no view for it here.
What is «in our words» is our standard wording; the books’ texts stay as they are.