Hanafi
The sources give no view for it here.
الرجعة بمقدمات الوطء
هل تصح الرجعة بمقدمات الوطء؟
Each school’s answer
In our wordsHanafi
Not stated in the sources
Maliki
Not stated in the sources
Shafi'i
Not stated in the sources
Hanbali
الرجعة بمقدمات الوطء لا تصح
لا تصحThe texts
١٦ - وَفَرَّقَ الْحَنَابِلَةُ فِي صِحَّةِ الرَّجْعَةِ بَيْنَ الْوَطْءِ وَمُقَدِّمَاتِهِ، فَإِنَّ الرَّجْعَةَ عِنْدَهُمْ تَصِحُّ بِالْوَطْءِ وَلاَ تَصِحُّ بِمُقَدِّمَاتِهِ وَفِيمَا يَلِي بَيَانُ ذَلِكَ:
«الموسوعة الفقهية الكويتية» (Kuwait) entry «رجعة» vol. 22 p. 112
From the schools’ own books
Maliki
The sources give no view for it here.
Shafi'i
The sources give no view for it here.
Hanbali
لا تصحIts place in the school’s books is not linked yet.
What is «in our words» is our standard wording; the books’ texts stay as they are.